Tag Archives: art

inventory

a new weekly feature I am trying out.
a collection of things I am loving at the moment.

inventory week one
1. Essie Nail Polish in Chinchilly. A glorious grey that I am refusing to retire.
2. Elle Fanning and Fishtail braids as featured in teen vogue. Elle was fabu in Super 8 this summer and fishtails are always relevant.
3. My new favorite blog, Note to Self is wonderful and you should check it out. Her posts are distractingly beautiful and well curated.
4. My newest shoe on the forever long wish list, a nudeypinktaupe platform heel.
5. Illustration artist Emma Block is another new addiction.
6. This is Arthur Melville’s The Blue Night, Venice from 1897 from the Tate’s Watercolour Exhibition. The exhibition’s tagline “invites you to challenge your preconceptions of what watercolour is.” While I won’t get to see the Tate’s exhibition I will be able to go see…
7. John Marin’s Watercolours: A Medium for Modernism. This image is his work The Red Sun Brooklyn Bridge, 1922. The exhibit is a traveling that has come to the High and I cannot wait to go see it!
8. The Swaying Meadow Skirt from Anthropologie. I need to see this in person, but I am pretty sure it is no meadow at all and instead lovely peacock feathers! Also the color is unlike anything I own, so wishlisted!

Leave a comment

Filed under Inspiration

A Leisurely Read

My ability to leisurely read a book has been severely limited since I’ve gone to college. The last fiction book I read for leisure was A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, and that was my traditional every other month read of that. (It is so underrated as a novel).

Before that, it was probably either a short story collection by Garcia Marquez or Incredibly Close and Extreme Loud by Johnathan Safran Foer. Both were wonderful. Both were read in the spring of 2010.

Over the summer I had all these lofty goals to read so much fiction and enjoy myself. But honestly, two 300 level literature classes, one of them where we read eight novels, kind of burnt me out. So I recharged by watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer, cheering on the Phillies and rereading all of Jane Austen’s works.

However, non-fiction is another story. Art History has given an unexpected outlet for leisurely  reading. I’ve talked about how much I love non-fiction, cultural microcosm books, favorite ever being Uncommon Arrangements: Seven Portraits of Married Life in London Literary Circles 1910-1939 by Katie Roiphe. They are just wonderful. Over the summer I read Strapless about my all-time favorite painting Madame X, which was equal parts scandal, art history and fashion. I also read Brunelleschi’s Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture inspired by my general love of the Medici family.

Since I’ve been doing research on Baroque Rome you think my discovery of my next leisurely read would have come from that. But actually I found a review of this book in a contemporary art journal I was looking at for my contemporary class.

So it is called Dark Water: Flood and Redemption in Florence by Robert Clark. And it is basically combines three of my favorite things: Florence, Art, and Disaster.

The first half of the book is about the history of Florence, and how floods of the Arno correspond and related to the Florentines. The second half is specifically about the 1966 flood, covered by Life magazine, and how the destruction and near-destruction of the epicenter of the Renaissance brought art lovers together from around the world to try and preserve the city.

It is phenomenal. I’m not completely done yet, but I would still recommend it to anyone interested in Florence. The history is pretty comprehensive of at least the politics of the Florence, which you don’t always get in Art History classes, as well as Dante’s interactions with the City.

Very wonderful.

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Other Readings

weird happening

I wonder if this happens with all double majors or people that take a lot of classes in different disciplines. But I am developing a completely different writing style for Art History paper than I usually do for English papers.

I just got back my first upper-level Art History paper ever (eek!) and I did really well on it, which I wasn’t too worried about because it was a small assignment and something I was really interested in. But the comments! My favorite was “clear and concise.” I am the least clear and concise person I know. I think in compound-complex sentences, one right after other. I am a big fan of the dependent clause on top of dependent clause.

Still, as I reread my paper with the comments, I realized that I think about Art in a clear and concise way. I make observations and then state what they mean and then develop the ideas further. In English papers, I wiggle back and forth into a meaning in a first draft, and then I have to iron it out a lot on revisions because I know my long sentences don’t make sense.

I thought maybe this happened because I learned how to look at Art critically later in life. I’ve always read Literature in a critical way, explaining my disdain for YA novels that I found useless and trite. So I don’t have a “literature” mindset. It is just how my mind works. But when I am writing about Art, I have not only think things but think about how to express them.

EDIT: My first poetry paper was just described as “clear and systematic!” Maybe it isn’t just Art History after all…

Leave a comment

Filed under College

inspiration for the dorm room style

Apparently my dorm room theme for this year is art nouveau, post-impression, peacock crafty. I have so far made a decoupaged side table, and am coloring a peacock headboard!

3 Comments

Filed under Art, College, Hobbies, Inspiration