weird happening

I wonder if this happens with all double majors or people that take a lot of classes in different disciplines. But I am developing a completely different writing style for Art History paper than I usually do for English papers.

I just got back my first upper-level Art History paper ever (eek!) and I did really well on it, which I wasn’t too worried about because it was a small assignment and something I was really interested in. But the comments! My favorite was “clear and concise.” I am the least clear and concise person I know. I think in compound-complex sentences, one right after other. I am a big fan of the dependent clause on top of dependent clause.

Still, as I reread my paper with the comments, I realized that I think about Art in a clear and concise way. I make observations and then state what they mean and then develop the ideas further. In English papers, I wiggle back and forth into a meaning in a first draft, and then I have to iron it out a lot on revisions because I know my long sentences don’t make sense.

I thought maybe this happened because I learned how to look at Art critically later in life. I’ve always read Literature in a critical way, explaining my disdain for YA novels that I found useless and trite. So I don’t have a “literature” mindset. It is just how my mind works. But when I am writing about Art, I have not only think things but think about how to express them.

EDIT: My first poetry paper was just described as “clear and¬†systematic!” Maybe it isn’t just Art History after all…

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under College

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s